Write my essay cheap uk supplements
Let's talking about write my essay cheap uk supplements.
Without anyone worrying about verifying their reliability, the links, related emails, comments on blogs and social network appointments multiply exponentially and in a relatively short time these contents become viral. And almost everyone thinks they are true or real. With the world of pseudo-medicine also happens. The credulity and the tendency to hold on to a nail burning when the situation gets complicated makes the miraculous promises have a hook and a large audience. Today I'm going to talk about one of those videos, because since I met him I've been doing a little follow-up and very often someone links it in the comments of one of my posts, especially if cancer is mentioned. Because this video is about that, about the possibility of curing cancer. It has already exceeded one million visits and although it may be a little exaggerated to consider it viral, its popularity is indisputable. It does not make much sense to read this article without having seen it, so, I confess that without any enthusiasm, I include it below. And with the same reluctance I ask you to see it before continuing reading. The lack of enthusiasm is not because it is not entertaining, that it is, but because of its cheating content. Prepare a lime or chamomile, sit comfortably and watch and listen. If you are a cancer patient, the feeling that you may have generated could be something very deep and acute. And that can become very painful. Schematically, these are their hypotheses and approaches: 1. This accumulation makes it difficult for the cell to feed properly and prevents it from having the oxygen it needs. In addition, the environment of the cell is acidified and as a consequence of all this, important health problems and diseases of all kinds are generated. Your treatment proposal is based on eliminating that toxic and acidic environment and killing the tumor cell, especially with medicinal plants, diet and other alternative therapies. I am not going to enter into evaluations yet, I have limited myself to enumerate the basic ideas that it exposes. But there is something that can only be seen when watching the video, the experience of seeing the complete presentation is very different from a summary with the main ideas. Because Martí Bosch is well equipped for persuasion and transmits credibility and confidence. It is convincing for someone without a scientific education but also for people who are trained and of a certain intellectual level. I tell you that we have a long time, because there is a lot to say. The truth is that it is on YouTube multiplied many times, so it is difficult to trace what could be its origin or who hung it for the first time. The last one is the one that concerns us and in which Martí Bosch spoke. On the other hand, before the protagonist appears, we see a presenter who briefly introduces him with all kinds of praise. According to the national registry of associations, this entity was registered in 2007 in Madrid. What is more strange is that it is impossible to find more information about this entity. At least I have been unable to know something about some pretty important details that would allow us to know its rigor or seriousness. Following what your own name suggests, what concrete investigations have you carried out and where are they? It does not even have a website, at a time when even breeders of canaries or chess players use this medium as a mechanism to make themselves known. The only information of a certain extent that can be found on the internet comes from DSalud again, in this article. They do not seem to be bad credentials, although in regards to their oncology specialty we have to trust their word. In the search engine of the College of Physicians your name does not appear associated with any specialty. In fact, every year licenses are withdrawn to practice and there are doctors judged for scams or other human baseness. The title does not assure us 100% honesty. In fact, if we continue to deepen in your history, we can find some shadow. In his defense, he argued before the media that he "never recommended to his patients to abandon traditional chemotherapy treatments" and the truth is that he was acquitted or excluded from the cause. In addition, the operation seemed to focus on the manufacturer of the product whose pro-cancer properties had never been demonstrated, with which Marti seemed unrelated. But let's leave aside this unpleasant case and get to the point in assessing the professionalism of Martí Bosch. A way to know the prestige of a doctor, especially if it is successful and innovative, is knowing your research work, the scope of such research and the results of the same. Nowadays it is something simple to look for since the main databases are accessible on the internet. I do not know any case of experts with relevant innovative treatments and more or less effective that are not in these huge databases. But Mr. Martí Bosch, does not appear anywhere, at least I have not found him. That is, he has never published any study or research that proves his therapies. I do not know if you have tried, but if it is not, it will not be because of lack of opportunity, because there are hundreds of medical journals in the world willing to attend research of very varied nature. And especially if they refer to cancer, a subject that sells a lot. Apart from this anecdotal information, have you participated in specific investigations? At least I could not find anything like it. So his prestige as a scientist can be considered a mystery. For my part, after many years of reading and writing about all kinds of vendors of miracle products, I have been able to identify common patterns that are repeated in these cases. I already wrote about them in this post about miracle diets, and I remind them again for this specific case: Explain a complex problem in a falsely simplified way. Propose the solution, unique and miraculous, with much better results than normal, without providing independent and rigorous tests. Use terms and pseudoscientific mechanisms without demonstrating or invented to explain the solution or problem and give rigor. Make comparisons with the competition, through lies and false accusations. Use false testimonies, not representative or exaggerated. To analyze all his talk, his proposals and ideas, we will see how Martí Bosch uses each one of them again and again, with examples and explanations relevant to each case. First habitual style in pseudomedicine: Explain a complex problem in a falsely simplified way. The main approach of Martí Bosch is born in the intense filtering activity of the lungs, liver and kidney, which as a consequence of the current way of life, become obstructed. This supposed clogging results in an accumulation of cholesterol, uric acid and CO2. And he gives as an example Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, which according to these approaches, would develop because of the death of cells due to acids and residues that prevent them from nourishing themselves. And the sclerosis, created by acid attack to the myelin that covers the nerves. Dermatitis, which would be generated when acids are expelled from the matrix through the skin. Or osteoporosis, which would occur by decalcifying the bone to neutralize the acid in the matrix. That is, according to these theories, the aforementioned waste load in the extracellular matrix would be the source of a large number of diseases. So much of the foundations of modern medicine would be wrong and the millions of doctors and researchers around the world would be wasting their time. In this way it would cause a huge liquid retention. Use minerals from other parts of the body to create salts and neutralize acids. As many of you know, cancer occurs when cells multiply uncontrollably as consequence of a mutation. That is, transform into a tumor cell that likes acid and crap and lives with a lot of sodium and without oxygen. Come on, that the mutation really would be a kind of evolution, a survival mechanism of adaptation to the environment. Recent research shows that considering cancer as a metabolic adaptation of the cell to an acidic environment full of waste is simply false. It is rather the opposite, that environment is a consequence of the activity of cancer cells, metabolically different from normal, as explained in this review. The truth is that, as the oncologist Barbacid sums up, in this article, cancer is a generic term that encompasses a large number of different diseases. In the links that I have included, you can find basic information that is quite complete and as anyone can see, the mechanisms for each situation are known in great detail. In fact, the experts work with relative normality with mutagenic agents of this type in their investigations, to cause controlled mutations and to be able to study them later. Regarding the theories of the extracellular matrix with which Martí Bosch explains everything, current experts and scientists who work on it do not think that the subject is so simple, far from it. Very interesting and, of course, much less simplistic and recognizing how little is known about the subject. The Americans, if they have had something good, are to teach us science through childish mechanisms. "The doctor refers to the series of the image on the right, in which the cells were represented by different caricatures characters. Obviously, it goes beyond its didactic virtues, it is wrong to document and cite its authors, who were not Americans, but French, and to verify that the thing is much more complex and difficult than Martí-Bosch told us. Let's move on to the second of the features of miracle treatments, that of proposing the simple super-solution that fixes everything, and again and again he explains that his therapies eliminate all the toxins from the body, restore the supposed imbalances of pH and kill the cancer cell The reality is that everyone who sees the video is left with the same message: This gentleman claims to have the solution for cancer. The details of this solution. His proposal is based on the following therapies: medicinal plants, salt baths, drinking lots of water and a diet with little meat based on the ideas of the pH or alkaline diet. Vitamin supplements and homeopathy. Sodium reduction, to hinder the creation of the basic interior in the tumor cell. Specific enzymes to deactivate specific proteins of tumor cells. Oxygenation to "feed" the cells, through ozone and peroxidases. These treatments would recover the functionality of lung, liver and kidney, cleanse the body of waste, reduce acidity and kill the tumor cell. But some have been done, which are what have served to publish some research and general reviews. I have found the following researches and scientific reviews on the subject: Unconventional therapy for prostate cancer: good, bad or questionable? At most they may have some utility to reduce some symptoms and anxiety or other psychosomatic symptoms, but little else. The third characteristic that sellers of miracle products use is the use of language and vocabulary that sounds like science or technology to be more convincing, but that really is inadequate, incorrect or directly invented. In this case, I hoped that being Martí Bosch doctor, someone with scientific training, would avoid using this resource. But as we have seen in the previous paragraphs, it does so systematically and continuously. All of your theory on diseases based on the extracellular matrix - which I will not repeat again - has that scientific background and is full of statements and descriptions of processes that nobody has tried, but which he takes for granted and obvious. Within this strategy of giving everything a "scientific" varnish, one could also include exaggerations about the prestige of the authors who developed the original hypotheses. But if we look for more data about this scientist on the internet, the information is surprisingly scarce. Regarding Pischinger's work, the same thing happens to us. If we read the entry on Wikipedia's extracellular matrix, Pischinger does not appear. And about thirty pages can be read in this link from Google Books. Regarding Pischinger's publications as a researcher, it is easy to find his work in Pubmed, but among the researches that appear, none is especially focused on cancer. To end this disaster, we must make it clear that the Austrian scientist never came to make trials on these therapies with cancer patients. Nor to demonstrate that these hypotheses had clinical utility. Thanks to it we were able to know that during a period of his life he was part of the Nazi movement and of societies related to eugenics and "racial hygiene", with suspicions of following ethically very debatable practices. And that in his more mature research stage, the one related to alternative medicine, was at least rigor and transparency contributed in his research works). Anyone who knows a little chemistry will know that the mechanism of osmosis is precisely the opposite. In any case it would cause the water to leave the body, not the toxic or dissolved compounds. In addition, as several studies have shown, expelling some waste from the pores does not seem to be so positive. This study and this other, for example, show that those who sweat much later expel less through the urine and have more concentration of uric acid in their blood. The second part of the sentence is false, the pH of the body does not change with feeding. And another homeopathy, I add. Fourth habitual style in pseudomedicine: Making comparisons with the competition, through lies and false accusations. The fourth strategy used to convince is a marketing classic. When you do not have too many arguments to sell the merits of your product, it is best to criticize and devalue the product of the competition. In doing so, he is also ridiculing and belittling all his fellow oncologists, who are the ones who use them. It is curious and contradictory to use this tactic, because if something sounds ancient they are precisely their treatments based on hydrotherapy, medicinal plants and the like, more typical of a couple of centuries ago and without evidence of efficacy. Or much more, his references to Galen and "his medicine" 2000 years ago are not exactly modern. Survival has doubled as an average and in some types of cancer the results are even better. Fifth habitual style in pseudomedicine: Use false testimonies, not representative or exaggerated. Martí Bosch ends his talk with the story of a testimony. Yes, spectacular, a patient who arrived in very poor condition but after his treatment achieved an almost complete remission of cancer. But only one thing fails: that it does not provide a single proof of its existence, documents, impartial witnesses or evidence. And again take this opportunity to underestimate the real medicine and comments ironically that doctors classified his testimony as a spontaneous remission, generating laughter among a public delivered. Therefore, it should not surprise us to hear someone who has had the good fortune of living a remission that "alternative medicine has cured cancer." I remind you again: Only one case and also without a single test. I have done the test and I get all these: Due to the continued operation of lung, liver and kidney for 24 hours a day, they end up clogging. This jam generates toxins and acidity in the environment of the cell. These toxins make cellular nutrition difficult. Many cells in this environment die. And surely you can identify a few more. Each one of them would need a good amount of solid and rigorous studies and trials to be demonstrated, because most of them are very revolutionary and contradict current knowledge. And we do not have an acceptable study; in fact, there are quite a few studies that conclude results in the opposite direction. So this whole theory can only be considered a huge hypothesis. And if that were true, following their advice would cure most of them and all the millions of experts and researchers in the world would be wrong. All this is so radically revolutionary and the solution would be so spectacular that it would be enormously easy to test through clinical trials and studies. So I ask him again: Why do not you do essays and present objective proofs of your affirmations? Considering that after 12 or 13 dilutions there is no longer a single molecule of active ingredient, I remember that it aims to help cancer patients with water and sugar. If someone wants to tell about his supposed cure, he must come with reliable evidence under his arm and identify himself in detail. When it was seen that the cancer did not subside with his diet, he underwent surgery to remove the tumor and thus could endure some time, but after a couple of years the cancer returned with greater virulence and died. But from there to cancer is cured with a diet... I'm sorry but I doubt it. If it were not for the sad thing that it is that there are vultures like that that are taken advantage of, it could be said almost that the video is even sympathetic or funny. In addition, a large number of meta-analyzes have been published in recent years that have shown how well-adapted chemotherapy in each case significantly increases life expectancy in several types of cancer. You can find them with relative ease in Pubmed. And in this case, more about health. Thank you. There are several who have heard or read about homemade salt baths to clean detoxify the body. It was already missing a new entry in the blog, but the wait has been worth it, because the article is very worked and is a most meticulous analysis. I think I should sing the "mea culpa", because I am one of the readers who sent you the video of yore. Coincidentally, not long ago, a friend sent it to me by mail, and she was enthusiastic about it. I answered in a cautious tone so as not to offend her, but now I think maybe I should have used a greater forcefulness. Finally, I congratulate you once again for your work. I have here some material that I have kept thinking about you, related to topics of this type. I'll send them to you, if you do not think it's wrong. Also the statistics, although there are not many comments tell me that more than 3000 people have already read this article. Which is not bad. A greeting and thanks again. Fortunately, each one can follow their own initiatives in the case of the search for information, where the only accepted thing is that only one can discriminate the reliability of the same. I will continue to follow your post to the extent that its content interests me or believes that I may be useful, for or against my own current conclusions. It is wise to change your mind and for that you must stock up on all kinds of information without prejudging it in advance. We are complicated, right? One and the other can save a patient. Let's not waste any. This guy who talks is not a fool to despise him. It's just like with the green laser to remove a prostate cancer. That goes well, even against the opinion of some. I have not said at any time that I am a fool. And alternative medicine does not save patients. further So my question is: why not scientifically investigate a less harmful alternative that replaces the desired health? You only have to say, but also, there are too many cases that official medicine does not work either. And if you do not ask any doctor why you have cancer. I have asked many doctors and none of them knows anything, they only apply the protocol, and keep on pulling. They do not investigate anything about the patient. Where are the opinions and statistics of the people treated with this doctor. I did not know him because I'm not Spanish and I've never heard of him. First of all, I congratulate you for the detailed and careful study of Bosch's elegant lies. I did not know him because I'm not Spanish and I've never heard of him. First of all, I congratulate you for the detailed and careful study of Bosch's elegant lies. I take note of your blog, it looks very good. Just start seeing the video a falsehood: if the heart pumped 5 l min. I'm a Vascular Surgeon and that's why I love your analysis, very correct. I have a question for you: if the base of medicines and drugs are the active principles of plants, why do you deny phytotherapy the credibility you give to drugs? The correct thing would be to say that the active principles of some drugs originate from some plants. Hence, the phytotherapy is effective there is a chasm. It's a good thing that some of you put a little sanity in this jungle of ignorant people. I have seen the video and do not ask for anything bad or money. Following the indications of the oncologist that each one has, I do not see anything bad in following the ones that this gentleman gives of complementary form, that does not speak from the jail. you accuse that he does not present evidence and you? They seem very interesting to me and the second, to say that we have to seriously ask ourselves why the boom of this type of therapies and "solutions for everything". My girlfriend's uncle is one of them, and thanks to what? Clarity of judgment can sometimes lose something important when there is a lot of vehemence. Waves of light or subatomic particles perfectly organized? And this is pure science at the highest level... which paradoxically is deeply linked to the results obtained by Buddhist monks, through prolonged meditation. The latter have used the human mind as an instrument of precision to get rid of all conditioning: true clarity is obtained through serenity and mental calm. What monks have learned and tried to convey not through concepts but through individual experience through decades of tireless practice is that matter is light. And basically nature is the reflection of the divinity transmuted into matter. Entoooonces: If we want to see cancer as a disease, let's see it as such. Or at least allow others to discover for themselves?? I do not think anyone is playing with other people thinking that cancer can be a mistake. According to this theory cancer becomes a problem when we go to the oncologist and they detect it and tell us that we have one year left to live. Panic lowers our defenses and our psychological balance goes into chaos. Cancer is chaos of matter. The mind in chaos is reflected in the material... I think that on the other hand conventional medicine lacks an individual search job by each doctor, many things he takes for granted. For example, cancer is incurable and diseases are generally unknown causes. And also that there are immeasurable markets behind the pharmaceutical... It is a lot of money and this possibly conditions the direction of research in general. For me there is a lot of business in the alternative, but there is also in traditional medicine, supposedly accurate and effective. They never sat down to establish together a diagnosis, and what for one was. One important symptom the other dismissed and so on. They should take note the future doctors. Health should not be understood only as the absence of disease and the patient should be addressed as a whole. Or people will take refuge in any alternative that seems more respectful of their human condition. Your analysis of Martí Bosch and everything he says is very good. However, to the margin to throw dirt on the theses of doctor Martí Bosch, that on the other hand contains explanations easily understandable even for the profane ones in the matter, you do not say nothing convincing that it demolishes said thesis. So I invite you to argue with strong arguments the explanations of the doctor, so you can understand the reason of his excepticism. Thousands and thousands of doctors from all over the world already do it with their daily practice, who understand, study and treat cancer in a radically different way to theirs. Let's see what you can say against the theories of this Doctor, Nobel Prize in medicine. A question that I think you'll know how to answer. Why do you sell your books? Without acrimony. Greetings and congratulations for your work. I have nothing against honest business, but I do have scams. Everyone has the right to earn an honest living. And I do not think anyone seems wrong. Another thing is to make a living swindling desperate people, I think. Something very different, at least according to my values. You'll have to dig a little deeper, but everything I write about those topics is online, free and totally accessible. It would be like the two great evolutionary currents Darwinism Lamarckismi. Nor do I believe that the video says that you just have to follow his advice, he says that together with the cleaning of the extracellular matrix facilitates the arrival of serum. I think that in the video we can observe very curious data to see cancer from another point of view. I do not think traditional medicine is 100% accurate and this type of illuminated either. A half term would be fair. Neither for you nor for me. Do not disqualify for free. And strong sentences for charlatans in forced labor camps, you would see how they came out less. Greetings. Knowing that chemotherapy is a million dollar industry and that it has very poor results. Why deny the possibility of alternative therapies?. If you do a little research you will discover that not only can you trust what the scientists say. He is a recognized oncologist and you are only a detractor, who believes he is the owner of the truth. How unfortunate that his vision is obtuse. There is no worse blind than the one who does not want to see. If I had cancer and they tell me to eat shit with pleasure I do it and I prefer to die in peace knowing that I tried everything. In the sky circulates a coin called faith and the miracle happens to those who have it. It takes faith to see a miracle. There are also people who have been healed by their faith or belief and that does not invalidate that you can not explain it by the scientific method. Humans transcend science by our faith, by what we believe. A positive attitude, an open mind and a trusting heart in God are the conditions of an inner healing and by default of a body without ailments. If you do not believe in miracles, think that life itself is a miracle. and more when you are bombing on television or Radio that pharmacies do that very well. and here we could dawn what they do to profit from the patients. And even, the scientifically proven and published in the right places, with the passage of time and new knowledge are dismantled and contradicted. that if you are not going to burn at the stake. The worst of all this is that there are people who believe blindly in this marabunta of charlatans and corrupters of ethics. If by my outside I sent everyone to bite a stone at a quarry. I was just diagnosed with colon cancer. Fortunately, he has a good prognosis and I hope to heal. And I will thank you for our fantastic public health system. I have read the notebook about Dr. Martin Search, after listening to some of their videos, frankly I did not deserve any credibility, and whose exposure was vulgar and lacking in rigor. I do not have medical training, but I have been a journalist and I think I have developed the instinct to detect what "smells" badly. And for that reason, I value the time dedicated by the author of the blog to dismantle the fallacious simplifications of Dr. Martin Busca. But I also want to express my surprise at a fact that produced a certain stupor and now almost a scandal. It turns out that the decent man name came to my ears through a doctor who was on duty at a health center in Madrid. He did not suggest to me at any time that it was an alternative to the surgical intervention that I am going to undergo if not rather as something to consider if I had to receive chemotherapy. Today I found the paper where he had signed his name and that's why I'm here. The truth is that, given what I've seen, and as a supporter of what I call conventional medicine, it still seems dangerous to me that this kind of unproven information is given from the public health centers themselves. I am almost by professional deformation a skeptic. And I also apply the rationality to assess even my illness. But I understand that in more desperate situations there are people who do it. What I do not understand is that those who have medical training, act with such a degree of immorality, prevailing on the prestige that their titles confer and on the ignorance or despair of the sick. It is punishable by law, sure, but the competent bodies should act. Look, I'm 71 years old and I have not been sick in all my life. I have almost always led a healthy life. Today I do not mail, but I also walk two hours at least daily. To my total amazement and even disbelief, I have cancer. Detected by chance, because I feel great. Small, without metastasis and I hope I will be eliminated without further consequences the day after tomorrow. But it is wise to be cautious and not so maximalists. They have not received either chemo or radio. And that is perhaps the most reasonable conclusion. That the best prognosis is "maybe" due to healthy habits. That the pharmaceutical industry is a business? That some make their August at the cost of suffering, gullibility or ignorance of many?. Let's be consequent: Let's analyze value, and criticize those aspects that deserve criticism and even contempt. But what we are and how we live is everyone's responsibility. And still, dear friends, life is pure chance. So let's enjoy the luck of living. And let's contribute to make it more balanced and fair. No one is going to give his arm to twist, it's a human condition. The human being is the stupidest creature in the Universe. Yes, I knew the existence of that chair. A pity that they create chairs for interests different from the scientists. One of his biggest criticisms is the simplicity with which Marti Bosch deals with the subject, its unscientific terms, comparisons, etc. However, these are not hypotheses of Marti Bosch. His scientific articles are available on the internet, I think he should read a bit of these researchers on which he relies before making erroneous accusations. If it is true that you mention Pischinger, saying that it is a "supposition" scientific support. Because he calls it "budget" scientific contribution you do not clarify it. So it is not about "believing or not believing", but about informing yourself. Angiogenesis inhibited by drinking tea. Sulforaphane, a naturally occurring isothiocyanate, induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HT29 human colon cancer cells. Dr. Bosch responded to my emails in a totally disinterested way, recommending treatments for my father. My father started these treatments before he started chemo, and almost all the symptoms that the tumors produced him only left him with the Bosch treatment in about 10 days. Some raise hypotheses that have not been proven, others are based on specific and very preliminary results, others have been carried out by fairly impartial entities. None have been confirmed repeatedly by other scientists despite having spent many years. This is called "choose a handful of anecdotal studies that interest me and obviate all those who do not." If all of Bosch's proposals are based on that ten jobs, we're wrong. Something that will never happen. Regarding the personal case of your father, if you really want to help others affected, I invite you to make it known to the scientific community and let them prove the results for themselves. It is that this type of testimonies always remain in anonymous or half-anonymous statements and without contrasted evidence. Few, the majority published in alternative journals and almost all theoretical or with essays on cells, not people. Not like some pseudo-doctors who think they're doctors just for having the race. Something that many @ s do not know even remotely what it is because it is more comfortable to hold on to what they were taught by other "doctors" as blind and blind as they are. I can only thank you because there are people really interested in non-invasive and real therapies. Not those multimillionaire therapies to fill the pockets of pharmaceuticals without scruples with the approval of mediquillos. And neither do you explain why this brilliant, traveled and professionally developed gentleman does not publish a study demonstrating his theories or organize a transparent and controlled trial by someone impartial. If everything he says is true, by not doing so he is letting thousands of people die uselessly. So I will immediately eliminate those that are offensive and all they want to do is insult me. We continue with anonymous testimonies that speak of brothers, cousins or neighbors. Now that's a shame on such a serious issue. I assure you that many of us would study them with interest. In that when you already have cancer cure it, well no. But I have to say that the type of food if it seems to acidify the body or alkalize. Who likes to make a palliative diet based on vegetables, fruits and few carbohydrates and sugars? Here I put a scientific man who seems to be quite important, do not you think? In a healthy person the pH of the blood is between 7.40 and 7.45. Follow a healthy diet and play sports does not make sense? Where did I get the texts from? You find this in a library or wherever you want. The human being has not modified his genetics, but we are putting many artificial substances or incomplete foods to the body. But, I repeat from my previous response, people are not willing to sacrifice so much. I insist, are you going to tell me where these texts come from? Do not twist my words, nobody is against a healthy life. But of those who promise exaggerated and impossible things and earn money with it. They also sell them on the Internet, and they change every time you do them. Sometimes the ph is higher and others lower. Look, when I get cold I do not take acetaminophen or any shit like that. I drink bicarbonate twice a day. This will be psychological not? The bicarbonate alkalizes. The alkaline diet, healthy, alkalizes the body and keeps you from getting cancer. You can believe what you want, but it is not more than that, a belief of yours. And the test is done with fasting saliva. This is a proven thing, and not just once, not twice. I gave the cold as an example. You can cure the vaginal fungi too, ay! The pH of the saliva varies a lot and depends mostly on the last thing you have eaten or put in your mouth. To say that the body is alkalized or acidified, the pH of the most important internal fluids, such as blood, should be measured. And I assure you that pH does not change, and if it does is that you are very sick. Having improved your health by modifying your diet is normal, if it is now healthier. And of that there is not a single test. It seems very good that you check the sources, but I tell you that if you find them, you will only have passed the first phase. After that, it will be necessary to verify that there is evidence of his affirmations. I assure you that time and science have corrected a long list of mistakes made by great geniuses. If you want one day we go into details and examples. I assure you that I have no interest in turning anything over, nor do I gamble anything or gain anything with all that. On the contrary, I would love to find simple, cheap and effective remedies, do you think that I and my relatives do not get sick? That is the worst way to deduce the cause and effect of a treatment because there are enormous possibilities of committing an infinity of errors and failures and letting oneself be led by biases. It has been shown in medicine many times. A greeting. better work for the good of humanity without paying large bills. He realized this and nothing else. and also clarifies that the tumor must be removed logically. He had a glioblastoma and we went, a few months before, to Dr. Bosch's office. Said consultation took place without at any moment agreeing to view, the referred doctor, resonances made to the patient. I am a biologist and evidently a lot of things seem to me a great simplification, but let us not forget that great simplifications brought significant advances in the field of health. The average time he was granted life was six months and takes a year and a half and goes on. As I said before I am a biologist, and yes, the body is acidified. Tell people who have died of metabolic acidosis after a great effort. Tell people who undergo processes of bone calcium relocation to combat plasma acidosis. And I do not tell you ph variations due to mucosal infections or internal infections, where the waste metabolites of those bacteria or other microorganisms can be fundamentally acidic, varying the pH locally if the infection is local, or more importantly if it is generalized If you studied biology or medicine you would see that there are many examples. Another example the greater or lesser presence of magnesium in the diet varies the ph. Magnesium oxide is a great alkalinizing. This does not mean that these ph problems cause cancer. Do not do like him and mix churras with merinas. I am glad that your friend is saved, but from there to relate it to the diet there is a long way to prove. Is your friend also an oncologist? Does anyone know a doctor who has been treated with such therapies? The now deceased, invited him to visit Moriano and told him about Biobac. My sister-in-law told him that these people were considered healers and that he would not get in their hands. No, we lived better in the Neolithic, without the harmful gilipollez of science. Do not see how it screws up the scientists that agriculture feeds us. Correct a congenital deformation, cure a bacterial infection or place a pacemaker is to overcome nature? Synthesize elements or elaborate materials that do not exist in it is to go further? What is genetic engineering? Place your faith where you want. I speak from the point of view of two university careers in health sciences and science and technology; with more than 10 years of clinical experience, not a doctorate precisely because of the following arguments. When one deals with people and not with patients, he discovers that the systematic and protocolarized medicine treats signs pharmacologically, and no longer even symptoms and even less worries about the causes. This is understandable in such a limited health system of budget or badly used money. Let's save vocational professionals who are not limited to textbooks. To me as to all my colleagues when leaving the university we filled our heads with theories, data, statistics and other numbers that are useful and necessary to teach and disseminate knowledge. In fact about 12 years ago create a blog similar to yours where I tried to dismantle many of these things and it was not difficult for me all the information was already published, it's just a matter of writing and a little more... just like a student. And how dare you investigate without using the scientific method? Two science careers do you have? Something like that can not be difficult to prove if there is or not. Reread the article, my tone does not pretend to be jocular, it's ironic. Because of the shame it gives me that there are chairs like that or like homeopathy. If I want to treat myself with synthetic products whose scientific basis shows the side effects they produce, I will go to the pharmacies. If on the contrary I want to do it with natural products that do not harm, I will go to a herbalist. Or try a few herbs that you find in the field, almost certainly you will end up intoxicated or with indigestion. Muscles and tendons, traumatologist, and with the ultrasound and report to the physio. They will see how it is cheaper and more effective than pseudo-medicine. Always the critique with foundation is good. We must go beyond the video of the character in question. All the theory he raises is not his. Simply perform a project on scientifically proven foundations. It is a "screaming secret" the truth of the acidification of the organism as a cause of different pathologies. If we see the different ancestral cultures from all over the world we will understand that it is nothing new. In my country Bolivia, for example there are diverse indigenous cultures that teach us to live in and of nature, that way the disease can not develop, even cancer. Now when dealing with this terrible disease, there are various controversies. But every time the demonstrations that the best way is the alkalization and purification of the organism, of that there is no doubt. Of this there are better presentations and explanations than of Mr. Marti, and everywhere in the world, so let's not close ourselves to this character. I repeat that all this theory is not the gentleman in question, if we investigate more certainly we will find many scientists who tell us about this. Now to your questioner, why is cancer still on the rise if we have the solution in our noses? As you can see, the information we see in the video is not crazy, it probably is not as accurate either, but it is very true. Let's not question so many things that are naturally obvious. Greetings from Bolivia, heart of South America. imagine the surprise that human beings can not believe that these remedies cost almost nothing. It is 100% normal for a large percentage of the population not to believe that the body can be prevented without delivering the savings of a lifetime to hospitals and pharmacies. and the Dr feels that he tries to explain them from the point of view of reason. Centinel expresses that with that he is implying that so many health professionals are wrong. No. I can only end by saying that health is a reward. Sorry if you felt offended, it was not the intention and you do not need sarcasm. I ask you to investigate, as I suggest to anyone and also to myself. And I do not mean just reading books and lots of articles that we find every click. In conclusion, the idea is to agree that the most important thing to heal or not get sick is to have a strong immune system, and that can be achieved in the way that I mentioned, according to my knowledge and experience, do you think it's silly? I hope you take this as a small and humble contribution to the conscience of society and thus fight against ignorance to end the suffering of so many people who live "blind" and are doomed to a cancer or other misfortune that we are largely we ourselves who created them. It's about giving them "some little" to help them avoid suffering. Do you agree? Go ahead. Greetings from the heart of South America, Bolivia. You attack their assumptions, but without realizing the one that falls in that game are you. It is clear that medicine is a big business, and that thousands of people die of cancer, and that the treatments are very expensive and leave the patient and their families in poverty. And of course, all the millions of doctors in the world are very bad and they only want money, but Martí Bosch is generous and does everything for free. If the argument to recommend medicine? Come on, fellows, to relax a bit!. This is not a "win wins" who is right, we all hit and we are wrong to some extent. Indeed, the boring recommendation of "healthy eating and exercise" says any health professional, but will make the necessary emphasis on these issues or will they take it as an accessory measure, nothing else and what will be the most important of their medications? You evaluate your professionals in your environment. You arrive at an office with a backache and before asking yourself what you eat, what are your habits, etc. They dispatch you with a prescription of antibiotics or analgesics. We should not denigrate clinical medicine but it is certainly an incomplete means of treatment, we must see the problem in an integral way, that is simple logic. The salt bath certainly has benefits and if it is a welcome detox help. I repeat that I do not share everything the gentleman says, but let's rescue what might be useful to us. Then, there each one with his health. I do not disqualify anyone. I have not found an email to write to you, that's why I do it this way. And I have always followed conventional therapy. I try to read a lot about nutrition and I see that many specialists agree on "nutrition be your medicine". Honestly, after watching the video, I had doubts about many things that said but I do not get the impression that he cured cancer. Even if it seems impossible, some of us do things without expecting money in return, thinking that we help other people. If you do not do it, I recommend it, it's quite rewarding. The treatments have nothing wrong, what is wrong is making exaggerated promises using false arguments and promises and making money with it.3. Our grandparents did not live for 90 years, those were a few, most died much earlier than now. It is not necessary to go to a private consultation to meet them or complement them with practices of healers without demonstrated effectiveness. You live more by the antibiotics and the refrigerator. Science is not to be repeating all the holy time that increases life expectancy. But someone has asked to repeat it so much? And what is the intention to increase it? This is a joke very well organized by power. All doctors are millionaires.2. As a doctor was wrong with you, all are incompetent.3. As your grandparents were long-lived, everyone in the world was too.4. Explain your theories and arguments and do not come with tricks or games, because I will not tolerate them. By the way, it seems to me that you have not been to the Gorliz hospital for a long time and that you do not talk to their doctors. Let's see if we update a little. For me that every morning Martí Bosch or one of his acolytes go through here with different names to write a stupid comment. It does not matter, if they go over the line, I'll erase it. But usually they are pretty ridiculous comments, so I do not care too much, that's how they are portrayed. If you read these comments, I warn you: I will not allow a single alleged testimony without proof. And when I say tests, I mean real tests. Create your website and write whatever you want. If it does not seem right, then do not come. You will explain, and it will be the judge who will sentence. You have looked for him, my friend. I have noticed a passion so visceral of the subject, that for this same it takes legitimacy from the parties and is losing interest. I have seen the video and I loved it. There are thousands of things that scientists can not explain. A cold is much simpler than a cancer and has not yet been invented nothing to eradicate it in less than a week. Because the human dimension far exceeds empiricism and scientific rationalism. Because we are not robots, but organisms whose physical, emotional or psychological reactions are often unpredictable. Sometimes the simplest is the best: a balanced diet, a healthy lifestyle, a doctor who shows empathy and good humor. Because osmosis is a chemical process that occurs between two aqueous environments separated by a membrane. For example, when sweating, urea is expelled, but it is the same urea that we excreted through the urine, which is the proper channel for its expulsion. I think that rationing yours "as everything is very complicated, the solutions must be simple" is totally contradictory. Unfortunately, solutions are often not simple, because nature, biology and the universe are not either. I do not see any crime in this! Do not spend anything.. it's like the advice 5 pieces of vegetables and fruits a day! I do not know if this cures cancer and God forbid, no one would tell you to stop your traditional treatment, but it really costs nothing to prevent, and if that works? For the umpteenth time, all doctors recommend eating healthy, no one is against that. But Martí Bosch suggests that he treats cancer with his treatments of a century ago. And this talk is a misleading advertisement for people to come to your consultation.3. I see a lot more anger in some comments, especially in the tens of them that I had to erase, insulting myself and accusing me of falsehoods and idiocies. Several of them treated by this doctor and many more by traditional medicine only. Similarly, at the psychological level, it is scientifically proven that a patient with anxiety, depression and other disorders responds in a worse way to traditional medical treatments against cancer. Martí Bosch ridicules on several occasions surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. it is quite clear what he intends with it. In addition, there is not a single proof that their proposals improve the effectiveness of conventional treatments.2. That review that links is very weak and to top it does not provide a single test or decent study showing that the food changes the pH, except the stomach and urine, as you know. Nor that "alkalinity" is beneficial. It raises some hypotheses, it makes reference to very generic and preliminary studies, but everything stays half. Compared with other reviews is very mediocre and does not serve to conclude anything. It is not true that there are many studies that demonstrate the pH, if you know them, I pray that the links. I am a fan of science and especially of medicine, my knowledge is not very complete, since I only have 3 years of higher education. As any person science, is not to distort by mere caprice and envy a hypothesis, there are a series of steps that must be repeated again and again in a reasoned manner and taking care of every detail. Well, those who have worked in a laboratory carrying out an investigation know that one day you do something with certain factors, the next day you repeat everything and something goes differently. An investigation needs financing, a laboratory with complete equipment, a good project and a lot of work. In addition to this you must present your work to the scientific community where you must explain everything again and again, and answer all the questions. If your answers or methods are not good or do not meet the requirements it assumes that your research will be erased from all records for not meeting the requirements. So I call not to follow this doctor, not because I do not like him, but because his work is not scientific. It is not about closing the door to the cure of cancer, it is about closing the door to the magical answer, for the scientific question. There was a time when I decided to eliminate that barrier and open myself to at least knowing other options and documenting myself well. By Consequently, in my family we have changed many habits, obviously without expecting anything because we had nothing. Those who have other concerns or responsibilities thanks to people like Dr. Albert have other options. By the way, if you want we talk about the mistake of Pauling's obsession with vitamin C, which several decades later is considered one of his biggest mistakes. I am not at all in agreement with that "neither some are better, nor others worse". for a desire to earn money at the expense of the diseases of others? So low have we fallen as to take advantage of the death of people? Where is the ethics and morality? Your analysis is very interesting, but I do not agree with all your conclusions. But... what do you do when that which you believe in fails? Well, almost 2 years ago, I began to feel terrible pains in an ovary and nothing took it away from me. The doctor could only tell me to take ibuprofen and ignored my despair about what I already did and still the pain did not let me sleep. After that, after many consultations with several doctors, I discovered that I have a chronic disease called endometriosis. You can inform yourself on the internet about it to compare. As a summary, I will tell you that it is very painful, although not all suffer the same; It causes many health problems and can be related to many other diseases and we do not know very well why it appears. It is speculated on with several possibilities, but it is not known for sure. Well, in my desperate pain, my partner insisted that I should change my diet and take certain infusions. So placebo effect nothing. I do not know what it is or why, or why some work and others do not. What I know is that now I sleep well, it hurts only sometimes and much less and I feel much better. Of course not, the medicine either, that this disease is known has no cure. And what interests pharmacies? As with any company, obtain benefits. In this case, selling medicines. Therefore, will they promote a study that says it is healthier to change the diet to prevent having to take medication? Well, it may not be enough for many, but if that helps them take 1 less pill a day, it's worth it. Do not they know about We Are What We Eat? I'm not saying do not over-medicate the sick, it's true that happens. And much less that the diet can not help alleviate the pain of endometriosis, there are scientific reviews that suggest that it could be a useful strategy, although it is not known for sure. In the post I say that what Martí Bosch affirms directly or indirectly in all his talk, that his advice cure cancer, they are not credible nor are they supported by evidence. Dozens and even hundreds are published every day, without the sponsorship of pharmaceutical companies. I read many of them and there are of all kinds. For example, try searching for "diet" in pubmed and you will have tens of thousands of links to food studies. Why else, is not the first thing they ask you when you enter a query? Maybe it's not a problem of lack of studies, maybe it's a lack of medical visitors, or I do not know. To begin with, I think it should be compulsory to study food in schools or in courses for the family or something like that. I do not know what they are, but perhaps other things should be taken into account. For example, the audience you were addressing. If it was a room full of doctors, scientists, etc or even people with a cultural level of a certain height, it clearly should have given data to be credible. If not... you will have to express yourself in a simple and entertaining way so that everyone can understand you. Sometimes we all simplify the explanations but behind there are much more complex things. For me, it is very clear what the speaker wants to convey to the attendees. I have not the slightest doubt. I'm interested in health, the cosmos and technology.
Despite its diminutive size, the legend of the hunter contains all the characteristics Airgun shooters have come to expect from a rifle that bears the famous Daystate logo. Nothing has been left to chance on the Huntsman, from its grade match cannon completely covered to its solid lock block, which comes equipped with proven 10-shot Daystates rotary loader. If you prefer not to self-load, this instant can be replaced with an optional single-throw tray that allows direct loading into the barrel. The rifle has been equipped with a pressure gauge to clearly indicate the state of the remaining air, and the recharge is an easy and quick courtesy operation of the standard pressure-fit filling system, perfectly hidden behind a protective release cover. Despite its diminutive size, the hunter's legend contains all the characteristic airgun shooters they have come to expect from a rifle bearing the famous Daystate logo. Nothing has been left to chance on the Huntsman, from its grade match cannon completely covered to its solid lock block, which comes equipped with proven 10-shot Daystates rotary loader. If you prefer not to self-load, this instant can be replaced with an optional single-throw tray that allows direct loading into the barrel. The rifle has been equipped with a pressure gauge to clearly indicate the state of the remaining air, and the recharge is an easy and quick courtesy operation of the standard pressure-fit filling system, perfectly hidden behind a protective release cover. Lomefloxacin auxins and gibberellins are the two hormones that are normally found in the juice of the aloe plant. A study published in March 2008, the microscopic images and morphological study characteristic traits revealed that the fungal isolate is Penicillium sp. These exercises are designed for adults who have been suffering from any of an injury or muscle tension. Best place to buy lomefloxacin online They are the ones who will be able to advise you on the acupuncture specialists in your area. you should vary the food with six to ten servings of different vegetables, where to buy lomefloxacin drugs Helen Mirren is 67 years old and an English actress. Google has detected spam generated by users on our site. Typically, this type of spam is found on forums pages, visitor pages, or user profiles. Again and again, it has come to our attention that there has been a lot of excessive on-line marketing and spamming activities on the site. It has come to our attention that there has been a lot of excessive on-line marketing and spamming activities done on the site. We would like to remind all members that such activities go against community norms, as well as our terms of service. We would greatly appreciate if such unwanted activities can stop immediately as this site is intended for members to share their common interests and is a place where all members feel comfortable. Please take into account that through our observation we have noticed that some members have been using inappropriate profile names and photos. Therefore we would like to remind these members to please use proper human names and refrain from using business entity names or product labels. We would also like to informed members not to upload explicit photos, or content and risked their account is suspended or even deleted. Topical anesthetics come in ointments, sprays or liquids. Topical anesthetics are used to prevent pain at the level of the skin's surface. Pain in the legs in a small child can be indicative of many different conditions, all of which have similar symptoms. It is important that any sudden problems. Less relief from instant back pain. cure joint pain during cold winter months. walmart, Buy Neosporin + Pain Relief Ointment, 1 oz. Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis. Discover a wide variety of popular first aid. With a solid balance together with opportunities for both the short term and the long term revaluation, I think that Biota is still very attractive at current levels. I started the Biota Pharmaceuticals coverage on October 20 at $ 2.41. The quarterly update that Biota provides on February 5 illustrates substantial progress and highlighted the reason why the action remains a huge investment. I will look to highlight what I felt were the most important parts of the update and highlight why they help support an investment thesis of this population that suggests significant growth potential and an attractive risk reward. The substantial progress in the last quarter has allowed the company to substantially clean up its balance sheet and removes much of the uncertainty with regards to revenue collection for this contract. I am very pleased with the progress management has made in this regard, which goes a long way in helping the company move beyond this chapter by addressing its history. Guidance for reading this trial that had been set for 2016 was reduced to the second quarter of 2016 on the call. I am happy to see that we are indeed going to get the result in the first half of the year, which means that the reading is just a little over a year of rest. In the main drug markets, there are 64 million people with asthma, 24 million of whom have asthma that is described as moderate to severe. This illustrates the wide scope of the flu this season. Royalty revenues provide a good opportunity for a setback for Biota investors. The company is currently negotiating just a little more than its own funds, given the current market capitalization of $ 86 million. Biota is one of the few small-cap biotech companies that has a cash runway in the foreseeable future and will not have to raise money in the short term. Disclosure: The author has no position in the aforementioned stocks, and there are no plans to start any position within the next 72 hours. The author wrote this article to themselves, and expresses their own opinions. The author does not receive compensation for it. The author has no business relationship with any company whose actions are mentioned in this article. Please be aware of the risks associated with these populations. Common use Femara is an oral, anti-estrogen drug that decreases estrogen levels in postmenopausal women to prevent certain types of breast cancer. Dosage and administration The recommended dose of Femara in adult and elderly patients is 2.5 mg once a day. Take with a full glass of water with or without food. Follow all the recommendations of your doctor. Your doctor may need to be tested regularly to check the effectiveness of this medication. Do not miss any of the visits. Your bone mineral density may also need a regular test. Tell your doctor if you have liver disease because you may need a dose adjustment or special safety tests. You can not start a cure if you are pregnant. When you are on this medication be sure about the use of effective contraception. Do not take more than Femara that has been prescribed. Contraindications Femara is contraindicated in women who are pregnant. This medicine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Stop taking the medication and consult your doctor if the adverse reactions listed above get worse. Interaction with other medicinal products The concomitant use of Femara and tamoxifen by a daily dose of 20 mg leads to decreased levels of letrozole in the blood. Caution should be exercised when letrozole is used together with drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. Tell your doctor about all medications, natural products, food supplements and vitamins you are taking. Missed dose If you have missed a dose, take it as soon as you remember. If it is almost time for your next dose, discard the missed dose and return to your regular schedule. Never take extra dose or double it. Overdose This medication is not likely to produce life-threatening symptoms. Tell your doctor if you suspect you have taken too much of this drug. It should be stored at a temperature of 20-25 C. Store away from moisture, heat and sunlight. It is not recommended to store in a bathroom and places available for children. We provide general information about medications without trying to cover all addresses, integrations of possible medications, or all existing precautions. Information on the site can not be used for self-treatment or self-diagnosis. All specific recommendations for each individual patient should be arranged with the health care coordinator or the doctor in charge of the case. We renounce the reliability of this information and errors it contains. We are not responsible for direct, indirect, specific damages or other damages resulting from the application of the content of this website or that are consequences of self-treatment. Find the lowest prices fenofibrate. Select the strength fenofibrate, the dose and the price you want. Never take fenofibrate less than the doctor who prescribed it for you. CompareMedPrices does not have a doctor on staff; nor are we going to refer you to a doctor who writes you a fenofibrate prescription. Finding medicine coupons for thousands of medicines with and without a prescription. Why this medication is prescribed Fenofibrate is used with dietary changes to reduce the amount of cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood. The accumulation of cholesterol and other fats in the walls of the arteries decreases blood flow and, therefore, oxygen supply to the heart, brain and other parts of your body. Reducing your blood levels of cholesterol and fats can help prevent heart disease, angina, strokes and heart attacks. This medication may also be prescribed for other uses; Ask your doctor or pharmacist for more information. Proper use of this medication Use this medication only as directed by your doctor. Take the medication at the same time every day to maintain the effect of the medication. Do not use more or less than, and do not use it more often than indicated. Carefully follow the special diet your doctor has given you. This is the most important part of controlling your disease and is necessary if the medication is to work properly. This medicine is taken once a day. This medicine is more effective if taken with a meal. The dose of fenofibrate will be different for different patients. Follow the doctor's instructions or instructions on the label. The following information only includes the average dose of fenofibrate. Your doctor can increase the dose as needed. Children's use and dosage should be determined by their doctor. By oral dosage form: For hyperlipidemia: Adults first, from 54 to 160 milligrams once a day. Your doctor can increase the dose as needed. For hypercholesterolemia: Adults 160 milligrams once a day. If you miss a dose of this medication, take it as soon as possible. Without However, if it is almost time for your next dose, skip the missed dose and return to your regular dosing schedule. To store this medicine: Keep out of the reach of children. Store away from heat and direct light. Do not store it in the bathroom, near the kitchen sink, or in other damp places. Heat or moisture can damage the medication to break. Do not keep old medications or that you no longer need. Make sure that any medication is discarded out of the reach of children. Your doctor will order certain laboratory tests to evaluate your response to fenofibrate. Do not let other people take your medicine. Ask the pharmacist any questions you have about how to renew this prescription. Before using it In addition to its beneficial effects in the treatment of your medical problem, this type of medication can have some harmful effects. The results of large studies using other agents that are similar to fenofibrate seem to suggest that fenofibrate may increase the risk of cancer, pancreatitis, gallstones and gallbladder surgery patient problems. Studies with fenofibrate in rats found an increased risk of liver and pancreatic tumors when doses of up to 6 times the human dose were administered for a long time. Make sure you have consulted with your doctor before taking this medication. In the decision to use a medication, the risks of taking the medication must be weighed against the good that it is going to do. This is a decision that you and your doctor will have to make. For fenofibrate, the following should be considered: Allergies to your doctor if you have ever had an unusual or allergic reaction to fenofibrate. Also inform your health professional if you are allergic to some other substances, such as foods, preservatives or dyes. Diet Before prescribing a medication for your condition, your doctor will probably try to control your condition by prescribing a personal diet for you. This diet can be low in fats, sugars and cholesterol. Many people are able to control their condition by carefully following their doctor's orders for proper diet and exercise. Medicine is prescribed only when additional help is needed and is effective only when a diet and exercise program is followed correctly. Fenofibrate pregnancy has not been studied in pregnant women. However, animal studies have shown that high doses of fenofibrate can increase the number of fetal deaths, decrease birth weight, or cause some skeletal defects. Before taking this medicine, make sure your doctor knows if you are pregnant or if you can become pregnant. Lactation It is not known if fenofibrate passes into breast milk. Studies in animals have shown that high doses of fenofibrate can increase the risk of some types of tumors. Therefore, this medication is not recommended for use during breastfeeding. In these cases, your doctor may change the dose or take other necessary precautions. If the victim is unconscious, or does not breathe, call 911 immediately. The prices of prescription drugs vary, however you can count on them easily being a third less expensive or even more. Do a search engine search for the name of the prescription drugs and the word "Mexico." Many medications are available in Mexico, but they are called by another name. If you can find the name of Mexico, it will be much easier when you get to the pharmacy where many employees do not speak English. Decide on the brand or generic name. Different pharmacies sell different types of medicines. Some only sell generic and others only sell brand name. Make sure you know what you want so you know where to go to get it. Make a list of all the medications you want along with the dose. Because you do not need a prescription for most medications, overdosing or taking the wrong amount can be a real danger. Divide your list into the brand and the generic name. There are also pharmacies in local supermarkets. These places most likely only sell the branded product.
Articles like Write my essay cheap uk supplements
Articles by Letters: