Read my essay back to me daya

Let's talking about read my essay back to me daya.

The Holocaust was the work of the Germans, who never denied their Christianity. The Christians agreed to exterminate us - by the sword, or in any other way... But, why? It is that Christians argue that they are authentic Am Israel. We are the old Am Israel, only the historical slags that must disappear completely. But to his anger, we do not disappear - and we argue that we are Am Israel. Therefore, they do everything they can to "help" us to disappear: Pogromos, inquisition and conversion by force. That religion proclaims that when they give you a slap, you must offer the other cheek - but in practice, it was she who hit us all the time. And worse than that: By the time we were replaced, we are in the rest of the world. We must cease to exist, or convert to Christianity. But we are a stubborn people, and we do not cease to exist. Therefore, Christianity had to adopt another theory: It does not matter if that town continues to exist, what is important is that it be humiliated. On the contrary, they stay that way for all eternity, as an excellent test. Thus writes the Christian religious philosopher Pascal - who was also a well-known mathematician. Based on that, they persecuted us and made us suffer until death. In comparison with them, the Arab problem is lateral: In our absence, they got used to living in our land and also coveted power. But the conflict with Christianity is not for a piece of land, but it is something basic, essential - who is Am Israel? This is how Christianity behaves according to that infernal triangle: Kill, convert or humiliate. They did not come back, we did. In effect, the prophecies are fulfilled in us. We are no longer the wandering Jew, the lonely Jew - we are a respectable people, who live in their land. Up to here the Catholic conception. Of course, even today we must strive to convert Jews to Christianity: They can no longer be killed, they have their own army. Also humiliating them became difficult. But they can still be converted, and that is what Protestants do all over the world - and especially in Israel. The budget of the mission in Israel - millions of dollars - is double that of all the other countries combined. From your point of view, converting a Jew is a great success - but doing it in Israel is the most important thing. Thus Am Israel will cease to exist. All of them act in silence and deceiving people, doing evil with cunning. They locate the Jews who are in a bad economic situation, give them money without speaking a word of Christianity, over and over again. That way they are linked to them, and after a year or two they start talking about religion. Thus they act without rest, when their goal is to convert all of Am Israel. Of course, we should not worry too much: They will not succeed. But also that they convert some Jews, it is a disgrace. We must be attentive, and fight against that shame and that reproach. On the booklets are drawn the Star of David, the candelabra and other Jewish symbols. They penetrate slowly into the Jewish world. And there are worse: "Jews for Jesus" - part of them are Jews who converted to Christianity. They have kipa, they speak Hebrew and they join the army. Also her daughter is, in the Ulpena. They teach Tanach classes that seem totally ordinary and normal - but over time, they introduce Christian ideas. They are about 5000, and they live all over the country - also in the settlements. They are missionaries in disguise. They walk from house to house in the jaredim neighborhoods and distribute money - as if it were from a charity organization. They return again and again, trapping their victims with their spider's web. So, maybe they'll leave us alone now? They are in the country, and they hunt miserable souls. They buy them with money, and then convert them to Christianity - they are baptized in the Kineret or in a hotel pool. You have to open Eyes and fight. Also on the outside they act, but the Jews there are more careful. They have good "antennas" to know how to differentiate. But here in our land, it is more difficult. They distribute free booklets of Judaism - and only in the end is Jesus named. We must take care of ourselves, be aware of the danger. Therefore, we must not forget that Christianity is the number one enemy throughout history. The depraved Arab killers are nothing compared. Also Arab weapons are Christian weapons: The Arabs do not know how to make weapons. They have stagnated for 400 years - from the cultural, scientific and technological point of view. They do not know how to make weapons, and if Christians will not sell them, there will be peace. The longed for peace will come by itself. But Christians sell them weapons, and teach them how to use them. Christians are our main enemy, in all generations. The Ramba "m writes that the whole Torah is a struggle against idolatry. Christianity is an idolatry disguised as Tanakh: Idolater inside, Jewish outside. One can be Jewish and Greek at the same time: A Greek idolater on the inside, and a Jew on the outside. Therefore, our struggle against Christianity is the same struggle against idolatry - although much more complex and sophisticated. We return to our land, we reinforce ourselves and we also reinforce our fight against them. We will reinforce ourselves, and we will strengthen ourselves. The leadership of a Messiah of flesh and blood, is difficult to accept for many in the nation. As a leader, the Messiah will not exercise any profession, but will be in the midst of people and will make use of the means of communication. His kingdom will be pure and without personal or political desires, during his rule only righteousness and truth will reign. At the beginning some of us will believe and others will not believe, it will be easier for non-religious to follow the Messiah, more than the Orthodox people. Then it will be revealed to some Jews, not necessarily to wise men in the Torah, it will even to simple people. Only then will it be revealed to the whole nation - the people will marvel and say What? Many have known his name, but they have not believed that he is the Messiah. " He never said that it is Yehoshua of Nazareth. The one that really makes me confuse the lack of seriousness of Messianic Christians and Jews is another, rather more complex: 2. b) The Antichrist and the false prophet. Chapter 13 of Revelation refers to the presence of two "Beasts": the first has an evident political mood, and the second a religious one. The woes and laments over that destroyed symbolic Babylon suggest to us that it is the nation that controls world trade, and that is a position from which Italy is very far away. He was dressed in clothes dyed in blood, and his name is the Word of Gd. And the heavenly armies, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed him on white horses. " Then, Rabbi Kaduri says that he will be rejected by some and accepted by others. According to the Apocalypse, the Messiah at his second coming does not come to be accepted or rejected; it comes to triumph and period. The only thing I see is the same as always: Christians and Messianic Jews have done the only thing they know how to do, and that is to read more. Israel has a political system with clear rules. We can foresee that peace will be achieved, there will be justice, and things will reach their optimum point. We can, then, imagine that very easily the non-Orthodox population of Israel says "really, this guy could very well be the Messiah". And then Judaism can say: "we have Mashiach." Good. Maybe then, as announced by Rabbi Kaduri, we will see a new era of peace and justice. Maybe then we can say "there is Messiah". In addition, an unprecedented level of global destruction. So we continue, basically, the same: the Jews are waiting for the first appearance of the Mashiach. They have already demonstrated that to sustain it in the Bible, they have to read it in an arbitrary way. HE manifests after the death of Sharon 2. He will make use of the means of communication 3. He will not know at the beginning that he is the Mashiach. Questions that a messianic, nazarateo can not answer. Only in the anti-Christian versions of the Toldoth Yeshu do they mention that these are a book. This verse used by the messianic ones to prove the authority of the Christian Scriptures. However this essay will not try to show such a position, it is more by means of study to different Christian texts in Hebrew and Greek the "divinity" of these will be analyzed in front of the Tana "and in turn it will serve for the reflection of the readers. However, the truth is that often these gospels do not coincide when talking about what really happened. Up to here everything in appearance is holy and good. From a single previous generation the family lineages of the Gospels in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek are totally different from one another, and even from Tana "j. It does not matter if your messianic rabbi tells you that this is not true, however see it yourself as it appears in the table below. The Eternal cursed this man as the prophet Yirmiyoh says 22.24, 30. Curse vindicated: "a man who will not prosper in his days, for no man of his seed will prosper by sitting on the throne of David and ruling Yehudah." However, among the Christians and messianists who claim that Yeshu "a is excluded from this curse since Yosef was not true father. This alone is enough to disqualify him as the Jewish Messiah. The long retinue of the apostles and saints approaches them with slow and solemn rhythms, as did the entourage of the emperor and the empress in the ceremonies. It is interesting that Roman Catholic Christians think the same Cfr. Literally: 'Sea of ​​Bitterness'. Literally: 'Mar de Amargura'. Materialistic scientists as well as idolaters. So, how is it possible for a man to see the Truth? S. - At present the only men capable of recognizing the Truth are those who acquired it by tradition. They can claim that they only accept what their eyes can see. But George Washington is a tradition accepted by all men. Even today, most of humanity does not know its name. S. - Did you ever talk to someone who knew him? Since then, the nations of the world have had our Scriptures and attest to its text. This happened only six centuries after King Solomon. In addition, Josephus' writings have been in non-Jewish hands for 2000 years. S. - Their own traditions refute their religions and prove their falsity. Although they had philosophers and teachers, none of these traditions tries to trace an ordered or credible tradition of a Truth given by Gd. These traditions are in themselves the strongest proof of their frivolity and incredibility. Not a single cultured man supported them. The notzrim also mention in their scriptures that their only followers were some of the most ignorant men and people of the lowest class. Even among them, the great majority opposed the Nazarenes. Yeshu's affirmation of being a prophet was based on his own word, but none of the Sages or their great assemblies who were at that time very active supported him. The writings consider him of the seed of David, but at the same time they affirm that he has no father. And well, even the most ignorant of our people know that only the lineage through the father, is taken into consideration for the biblical genealogy. He also said that he did not intend to change the Law of Moshe, but he himself annulled some laws and his followers annulled all. On the contrary, Islam emerged and expanded in many nations, while Christianity itself was divided into many belligerent sects that killed each other. Matthew writes: "Zechariah, son of Berechiah, whom you killed." He came to Ajimélej, father of Abiathar. Yaakob was not buried in Shechem. S. - Their present scholars do not lack explanations, including the affirmation that our Scriptures are incorrect. But even giving the explanations that they want, the original followers of Yeshu gave a testimony for all times of their clear ignorance in simple matters. But remember that these early writers were also interested in checking their cause with the Scriptures, therefore in addition to errors, there are numerous examples of paragraphs in the Scriptures that intentionally distorted. Read at the end of the first chapter of Hoshea. Another case: the paragraph "For this commandment that I command you today, is not incomprehensible to you and is not far away. But the word is very close to you in your mouth and in your heart, to fulfill it. " Another case: the passage "Sacrifices and offerings you did not want, when I opened my ears". A clear and manifest passage that listening and obeying Gd is more important than donating offerings. But they quote it to prove that the body of their guide was chosen as an expiation instead of the offerings and they explain it like this: "Sacrifices and offerings you did not want, but you appropriated a body". But they claim that this passage is proof that Hashem sent for their guide to Egypt, a place they say was taken as a child. And I said to you send my son and he will serve me. " The list of such examples is very long. You make this mistake twice on two different occasions. His narrations of the Bible are a miscellany of errors. Obvious mistakes like these, refute any pretension of prophecy. S. - In addition, Muhammad declares in numerous passages that his contemporaries mocked him as an impostor and demanded miracles and convincing signs. The theme most frequently mentioned in the Qur'an is the opposition and skepticism of his generation. To challenge his opponents who ridiculed him, his only weapon was the threat of punishment in the world to come and the threat of destruction in this life, which he frequently dealt with with his own sword. And even so, both admit that our Sages opposed them. By admitting this, they check their error. S. - And that they were not made through them any of the obvious, perennial, public and irrefutable miracles. But our tradition remains among those of other nations as a living being among the wax statues. Our documents establish that our entire nation witnessed the partition of the Red Sea, through which we passed and in which the Egyptians drowned. After that, for 40 years, our entire nation was a constant witness of the cloud of Divine glory and the pillar of nocturnal fire, and for forty years each person ate what descended from Heaven. These facts were not counted by individuals, but were witnessed by millions. The people were not docile, but obstinate, because they opposed their guides on numerous occasions and accepted only what they could see. After receiving the Torah, they spent forty years in close union and scarce contact with other nations, so that they could consolidate their knowledge of Torah without infiltration of foreign influences. Since they had no land to till or trade, they had enough free time to devote themselves to the study of the Torah with the utmost diligence. The Torah was not preached by individuals who subsequently managed to persuade or coerce crowds, such as religions created by man. From the first day, the Torah was accepted by the entire nation without exception. The fact that such expression is placed in the very end of the Torah, is evidence of its extreme importance. And this maxim is emphasized again and again. These were not matters done privately, witnessed by some individuals who then persuaded multitudes to believe. The crowd was an eyewitness. From the obsession to define the "correct way of believing", an objective incompatible with human nature: inevitably, everyone ends up developing their own ways of appreciation of things. At the end of the day, no matter how much affinity one may have in general aspects - whatever the subject may be - there will always be differences in particular opinions. This is something that the so-called Christian orthodoxy does not tolerate, and the history of this culture and religion has been a fierce battle to establish -generally, impose by force- the correct way of understanding things. Therefore, in order for Roman Catholicism to consolidate itself as official Christianity, it first had to impose itself - quite violently on some occasions - on other ways of understanding the Christ. The worst enemy of Catholicism was, at the time of seizing control, Arianism, with which it had to coexist several centuries before defeating it definitively. In fact, it is quite simple: Jesus of Nazareth has not been understood correctly, or his teachings have not been applied correctly. The first point has been of vital importance for Christianity in relation to Judaism. In the end, for any Christian committed to making everyone believe in Jesus, it is a very difficult point to assimilate why the Jews - Jesus' own people - did not believe in him. For this reason, many of their arguments have always had a specific focus: in what way can the Jews be presented with the correct vision of Jesus, so that they can understand that he is the Messiah? They do not realize it, but it's a ridiculous position. Generally, they appeal that the big problem is the terrible testimony that the Catholic Church has given with its violent ways of trying to convince. Or even, the strategic error of Protestantism for a long time and in many places, when trying to achieve conversions of Jews that imply a complete abandonment of their spiritual and cultural roots. The surprising thing is that they do not accept, in any way, that the matter is simpler: the Jews can not believe in Jesus and now. Jesus does not satisfy anything that has been taught by Judaism for 35 centuries. That's why we do not believe, not because Catholics are evil and certain Protestants are clumsy and imprudent. That, in fact, is insulting: it reduces us to a ball of fools without criteria that have always made decisions based on the visceral. This is how the so-called Messianic Judaism arose: a group of English Protestants of Hebrew origin -to a greater or lesser extent-, who set out to recover part of their cultural identity, without ceasing to be Christians. And that, inevitably, caused the most devout Christians to come back to the question: why have we not been able to show the Jews that Jesus is the Messiah? And there the option appeared: a type of Christianity that incorporates the external elements of Judaism, perfect for Jews to believe, but without distancing themselves from their identity. Or Natzratim, as they prefer to call themselves, to feel more Jewish. The Natzratim have reached the extremes that many Messianic Jews would not have wanted to reach. Even, they tend to maintain critical opinions - sometimes, even, openly bad - of the Messianics. In that regard, I must admit that they have designed the most Jewish Jesus that has been achieved to date. But they have a very serious problem: they have no text on which to base themselves. Jesus of Nazareth is irrelevant to rabbinical Judaism, and therefore there is no kind of tendency in Judaism during the last two thousand years that serves to support their beliefs. Then, they have no choice but to appeal to the New Testament, and that is where all their arguments capsize. And, not being so, they have to start inventing budgets as false as a three dollar and eight cents coin. But it is not the same to speak of the New Testament as a finished product. Finally, the languages ​​in which they are written are the characteristic languages ​​of the Jewish literature of those times: Hebrew and Aramaic. Only a very small percentage of texts of the Dead Sea is in Greek. Instead, the New Testament began to integrate outside of the Jewish context. The first to integrate a collection of "sacred texts" was Marcion, later condemned as a heretic by the Church in the West. After him, several Christian leaders began to define a possible list of sacred texts. They never mention anything like a sacred canon in these communities. The urgency of defining a Christian sacred canon was confirmed until the Council of Nicea, but not even there was achieved. This is a fact that can be corroborated by anyone who likes, in any encyclopedia or article about the process of conformation of the New Testament. But the Natzratim do not accept it. But it is also a well-defined fact that that original Hebrew did not cover more than a third of the current text of Mark, and that the final text, as we know it, only exists in Greek in the ancient manuscripts. What's more, they were written for non-Jews, so it turns out, the expression is stupid, to suppose that they were originally written in Hebrew. That the recipients were not Gentiles, but the lost tribes of Israel. Even considering the possibility that this was true, it is a fact that the Jews of the diaspora did not speak Hebrew. The language in which they evolved was Greek, even in communities of a high cultural level such as Alexandria. It is the essence of Christianity: the possibility of giving a universal dimension to the Bible, because otherwise, it must be assumed that it is the exclusive patrimony of the Jewish people. There is nothing to negotiate: they have as much right as those of the tribe of Yehudah. However, Paul always advocates that these things are not imposed on them. It is obvious: because they are not Jews. The language of the New Testament, the process of conformation and the geographical spaces in which it was given, only support the idea that for 16 centuries is quite clear: it is a Gentile text. Therefore, there is no literary correlate similar to the New Testament in Jewish literature of the time. Even literary styles are more related to Hellenic literature, than to Jewish literature. However, over the years it has become clear that O'Callaghan was right, and today there is no philologist who questions the work of this Spanish scholar. Naturally, the biblistas continue stubbornly to deny something that, incidentally, does not correspond to their area of ​​work. Then, we have the fact that a fragment of the Gospel of Mark was recovered in a collection of Jewish texts whose later date is the year 68. It is, therefore, the oldest fragment of the New Testament. Interestingly, it is one of the few papyri recovered in the Dead Sea. And, to top it off, it's in Greek! I do not know whether to grant them the benefit of the doubt and to suspect that they say it in a kind ignorance, or simply to conclude that their arguments are fallacious and deceitful. The proof is simple: the type of writing used in the Peshitta accuses Byzantine traits. Also, it is not in Aramaic, but in Syriac Aramaic. Therefore, the frequent quotations to the Hebrew language are only an attempt to give the New Testament a lining that it does not have. It's about translations, not original words. Of course, when coaxing unwary, the same and can work. Correct, except that we have a problem: there is no evidence that that text was originally written in Hebrew. Nor, that this hymn has been sung first by Hebrew-speaking communities. The starting point is a text in Greek, and in that language, the text says "God was manifested in flesh." So, if it is a question of doing serious work of exegesis, the starting point is that, and not a supposed text that should have said otherwise. That, in simple terms, is a sham of very poor quality. Therefore, Judaism has always rejected the New Testament, because it is incompatible. In addition to all this nonsense, they appeal to the fact that they are the heirs of the group of Jews who followed Jesus. In other words, they are the true followers of Jesus. What we have today appearing everywhere on the internet is just another sect that emerged from the evangelical context, which has become the inevitable schism within messianic tendencies.

They call themselves: Messianic Jews. Generalities and Origin of the missionaries: Christianity today is a religion of many shades. Let's see an example: If you walk through a Latin American city you can find dozens of types of Christianity. Each of these religious groups was born at a moment in history. The santeros will be descendants of Nigerian slaves who amalgamated the Yoruba religion with the Christianity of the Spaniards, and finally, the "strong prayer to the esbíritu santu" is led by fervent Brazilian shepherds. Let's keep this in mind and for a moment we close the scene so that we know the origin of the missionaries and how we know they are a new Christian expression. The origin of the missionaries dates back to the time of Puritanism in England, who claimed to be the literal personification of all the biblical promises. They declared themselves the "true Israel". These Puritans saw the conversion of the Jews as a sign for the "second coming of Christ." He affirmed with respect to the Jews: "a prophetic return to Palestine when they convert to Christ." Based on these bases, the Christian-Hebrew movements that decide to carry out the evangelistic work in the Jews in order to hasten "the coming of Christ" are founded. Many British Christians had been indoctrinated to think that they were descendants of the ancient Israelites, the 10 tribes... this racial theory gave birth to "Anglo-Israelism". The "explosion" and the entry into force of this movement began in the year 1813 when a group of Jews converted to Christianity began community work as Christian-Hebrew, founding an association called "Benei Abraham." Initial membership: 147, and in a short time reaches 600 of several European countries and North America. Latin America: destination of missionaries. Let's open the curtain again in the example we had used. Since there are Unitarian Christians, so there are also Unitarian Messianists. Since there are "Restorationist" Christians, there are also Messianists who claim to have separate ancestry. Since there is a minority of Christians who do not believe in virginity, so there are Messianists who do not believe in virgin birth. Note: I use the name "messianists" and not "messianic" because some of those groups have already chosen to reject the name "Messianic". However, all are known in Judaism as "missionaries" because of their origin. Doctrines and Christian ideas that are also common in missionary messianist groups: Yahwehism. This allows a marked accent of "religious caudillismo" to be born in the ideology of the evangelical mind. At the end of the day, all Christian denominations have always been born like this: a schism produced by a "leader" who from time to time believes himself enlightened and affirms that God has chosen him with a mission. Execute the great commission: make mass proselytism, or as they say in their jargon «win souls». Overcome historical failure and become a "worthy people of God" that shows the world how to "be light" and how the Bible should be lived. These three streams of "missions" always go together, but depending on the case, there will be one that prevails more than the others. Mission 3: Messianists say that the rest of Christian churches are wrong, that they must overcome this historical failure and become an active "people of God" at the forefront of fulfilling their expectations: "be light to the world" by revealing people how must we live the bible? That is the role of religious caudillizmo in the Christian future: each "teacher" creates new churches, new currents and they change their name. The name "Christian" has fallen into disuse. There are evangelicals who prefer to be called "Christocentric". There are missionaries who already deny being "Christian" or "Messianic Jews" and now like to be called "Nazarenes", "Netzaritas" or any new name that sounds more chic and Hebrew, more "natz-". Doctrine of Christian fundamentalism that establishes the belief that the Anglo-Saxons were one of the lost tribes of Israel, thus being the true chosen ones by God at present. Arianism: Christian doctrine considered as heterodox and that preaches that Jesus is not divine but only a human being. Docetism: Christian Gnostic doctrine that affirms that the body of Jesus was not that of an ordinary human being but that it was divine, celestial. They have created new "lunar" calendars and have named them as "true" ones, "restored ones". They say that they are not "roma", but all their inspiration always comes from Rome. All the articles exposed in this blog have been revised to avoid that they contain insults. If the reader finds rudeness somewhere, please report it for deletion. The leadership of a Messiah of flesh and blood, is difficult to accept for many in the nation. As a leader, the Messiah will not exercise any profession, but will be in the midst of people and will make use of the means of communication. His kingdom will be pure and without personal or political desires, during his rule only righteousness and truth will reign. At the beginning some of us will believe and others will not believe, it will be easier for non-religious to follow the Messiah, more than the Orthodox people. Then it will be revealed to some Jews, not necessarily to wise men in the Torah, it will even to simple people. Only then will it be revealed to the whole nation - the people will marvel and say What? Many have known his name, but they have not believed that he is the Messiah. " He never said that it is Yehoshua of Nazareth. The one that really makes me confuse the lack of seriousness of Messianic Christians and Jews is another, rather more complex: 2. b) The Antichrist and the false prophet. Chapter 13 of Revelation refers to the presence of two "Beasts": the first has an evident political mood, and the second a religious one. The woes and laments over that destroyed symbolic Babylon suggest to us that it is the nation that controls world trade, and that is a position from which Italy is very far away. He was dressed in clothes dyed in blood, and his name is the Word of Gd. And the heavenly armies, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed him on white horses. " Then, Rabbi Kaduri says that he will be rejected by some and accepted by others. According to the Apocalypse, the Messiah at his second coming does not come to be accepted or rejected; it comes to triumph and period. The only thing I see is the same as always: Christians and Messianic Jews have done the only thing they know how to do, and that is to read more. Israel has a political system with clear rules. We can foresee that peace will be achieved, there will be justice, and things will reach their optimum point. We can, then, imagine that very easily the non-Orthodox population of Israel says "really, this guy could very well be the Messiah". And then Judaism can say: "we have Mashiach." Good. Maybe then, as announced by Rabbi Kaduri, we will see a new era of peace and justice. Maybe then we can say "there is Messiah". In addition, an unprecedented level of global destruction. So we continue, basically, the same: the Jews are waiting for the first appearance of the Mashiach. They have already demonstrated that to sustain it in the Bible, they have to read it in an arbitrary way. It manifests itself after the death of Sharon 2. It will make use of the means of communication 3. It will not know at the beginning that it is the Mashiach. Questions that a messianic, nazarateo can not answer. Only in the anti-Christian versions of the Toldoth Yeshu do the mention that these are a book. This verse used by the messianic ones to prove the authority of the Christian Scriptures. However this essay will not try to show such a position, it is more by means of study to different Christian texts in Hebrew and Greek the "divinity" of these will be analyzed in front of the Tana "and in turn it will serve for the reflection of the readers. However, the truth is that often these gospels do not coincide when talking about what really happened. Up to here everything in appearance is holy and good. From a single previous generation the family lineages of the Gospels in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek are totally different from one another, and even from Tana "j. It does not matter if your messianic rabbi tells you that this is not true, however see it yourself as it appears in the table below. The Eternal cursed this man as the prophet Yirmiyoh says 22.24, 30. Curse vindicated: "a man who will not prosper in his days, for no man of his seed will prosper by sitting on the throne of David and ruling Yehudah." However, among the Christians and messianists who claim that Yeshu "a is excluded from this curse since Yosef was not true father. This alone is enough to disqualify him as the Jewish Messiah. The long retinue of the apostles and saints approaches them with slow and solemn rhythms, as did the entourage of the emperor and the empress in the ceremonies. It is interesting that Roman Catholic Christians think the same Cfr. Literally: 'Sea of ​​Bitterness'. Literally: 'Mar de Amargura'. Today I'm gonna writte about some people who disguise themselves with hassidic dresses, using bushy beards, black hats, yarmulke and talitot. They call themselves "messianic", "followers of yeshua", "Nazarenes" or even "Natzratim". Today, that old and failed theology of the Anglo-Israelism has changed. Their religious leaders and pastors have thought that they are "being restored" and all of these, preached in frenzied sermons have created new denominations and a lot of new independent churches. His videos are well known because he appears dressed with hassidic style. They do not believe in Jewish and Christian historical sources of the early centuries, but they do not have one! They do not even have a single historical source! There is no historical evidence to the effect that they are the true followers of the first century person. Moreover, this group called "natzratim" does not have even 20 years of existence. Despite this missionary group disguises in a better way than others, their believers are a bunch of ignorant people. Another missionary, Michael Rood. A former American military dresses with extravagant costumes to showcase their ideas, which are nothing but an "hebrew" camouflage of an Adventist sect called "the sacred name movement". He's like other pseudo-rabbi, Marshall Koniuchowsky. Another issue about missionaries: they re-edit the "New Testament" which they call "writtings of the first disciples. Anyway, in the net you can find more about those missionaries disguised as jews. Their teachings are Baptist teachings but disguised as "jewish". Founder of a new hebraized christian sect called "natzratim". Despite of disguising like hassidic jew, he's against Judaism. They claim to be the original followers of Jesus but obviously, do not have any historical evidences. The truth is they are neo-hebraized Christians but the feel embarrassed. Some relatives of him founded a corporate network in Florida, dedicated to missionary marketing. Occasionally I disguise with tallit and kippah. He's a Mumar and by Halacha he is not jewish any more. Self-appointed "rabbi" and "moreh". You have been accused of fraud because you have non-valid conversions and fake titles of yeshiva. Manipulated the jewish literature and use it in order to demonstrate his beliefs, but refuses to believe in it when proves the fake messiahship of Jesus. Eddie Chumney Christian, the mention that these are a book. This verse used by the messianic ones to prove the authority of the Christian Scriptures. However this essay will not try to show such a position, it is more by means of study to different Christian texts in Hebrew and Greek the "divinity" of these will be analyzed in front of the Tana "and in turn it will serve for the reflection of the readers. However, the truth is that often these gospels do not coincide when talking about what really happened. Up to here everything in appearance is holy and good. From a single previous generation the family lineages of the Gospels in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek are totally different from one another, and even from Tana "j. It does not matter if your messianic rabbi tells you that this is not true, however see it yourself as it appears in the table below. The Eternal cursed this man as the prophet Yirmiyoh says 22.24, 30. Curse vindicated: "a man who will not prosper in his days, for no man of his seed will prosper by sitting on the throne of David and ruling Yehudah." However, among the Christians and messianists who claim that Yeshu "a is excluded from this curse since Yosef was not true father. This alone is enough to disqualify him as the Jewish Messiah. The long retinue of the apostles and saints approaches them with slow and solemn rhythms, as did the entourage of the emperor and the empress in the ceremonies. It is interesting that Roman Catholic Christians think the same Cfr. Literally: 'Sea of ​​Bitterness'. Literally: 'Mar de Amargura'. Today I'm gonna writte about some people who disguise themselves with hassidic dresses, using bushy beards, black hats, yarmulke and talitot. They call themselves "messianic", "followers of yeshua", "Nazarenes" or even "Natzratim". Today, that old and failed theology of the Anglo-Israelism has changed. Their religious leaders and pastors have thought that they are "being restored" and all of these, preached in frenzied sermons have created new denominations and a lot of new independent churches. His videos are well known because he appears dressed with hassidic style. They do not believe in Jewish and Christian historical sources of the early centuries, but they do not have one! They do not even have a single historical source! There is no historical evidence to the effect that they are the true followers of the first century person. Moreover, this group called "natzratim" does not have even 20 years of existence. Despite this missionary group disguises in a better way than others, their believers are a bunch of ignorant people. Another missionary, Michael Rood. A former American military dresses with extravagant costumes to showcase their ideas, which are nothing but an "hebrew" camouflage of an Adventist sect called "the sacred name movement". He's like other pseudo-rabbi, Marshall Koniuchowsky. Another issue about missionaries: they re-edit the "New Testament" which they call "writtings of the first disciples. Anyway, in the net you can find more about those missionaries disguised as jews. Their teachings are Baptist teachings but disguised as "jewish". Founder of a new hebraized christian sect called "natzratim". Despite of disguising like hassidic jew, he's against Judaism. They claim to be the original followers of Jesus but obviously, do not have any historical evidences. The truth is they are neo-hebraized Christians but the feel embarrassed. Some relatives of him founded a corporate network in Florida, dedicated to missionary marketing. Occasionally I disguise with tallit and kippah. He's a Mumar and by Halacha he is not jewish any more. Self-appointed "rabbi" and "moreh". You have been accused of fraud because you have non-valid conversions and fake titles of yeshiva. Manipulated the jewish literature and use it in order to demonstrate his beliefs, but refuses to believe in it when proves the fake messiahship of Jesus. Eddie Chumney Christian,


Articles like Read my essay back to me daya


Articles by Letters:

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9